Sunday, February 19, 2017

Thirteen At Dinner (1985)

Peter Ustinov as Hercule Poirot.
Premise:  Lady Jane Edgware (Faye Dunaway), an actress, seeks Belgium detective Hercule Poirot's help with obtaining a divorce. Surprisingly, Poirot (Peter Ustinov) agrees--only to discover that Lord Edgware has no qualms about splitting from his wife. The divorce becomes moot, though, when Lord Edgware is found murdered in his study. All the suspects have solid alibis...to include Lady Edgware who attended a dinner with a dozen other guests at the time of the murder. Another actress, noted for her impression of Lady Edgware, is soon found dead from an apparent drug overdose (it's not!). There's a third murder before Poirot and his little gray cells can identify the murderer and his or her methods.

Running Time: 94 minutes.

Status:  CBS originally broadcast Thirteen at Dinner in September 1985. It's available on DVD as part of the Agatha Christie Classic Mystery Collection, which contains all three of Peter Ustinov's made-for-TV movies as Hercule Poirot plus other TV movies based on Agatha Christie novels.

Production Notes:  This was the third of Peter Ustinov's six appearances as Hercule Poirot. It was preceded by the theatrical films Death on the Nile (1978) and Evil Under the Sun (1982), which was his best. His next three Poirot films were all made for CBS and broadcast in 1985-86: Thirteen at Dinner, Dead Man's Folly, and Murder in Three Acts. He returned as the Belgium detective one last time for the theatrical film Appointment with Death (1988). Thirteen at Dinner is notable for co-starring David Suchet as Inspector Japp. Suchet would go on to play Poirot in a long-running, critically-acclaimed television series beginning in 1989.

Our Review:  The main problem with this adaptation of Christie's 1933 novel Lord Edgware Dies is that a key casting choice gives away the ingenious nature of the crime much too early. I won't say more at the risk of spoiling the plot. A secondary issue is the decision to update the novel from the 1930s to the 1980s. Hearing characters utter expressions like "dude" in a Christie mystery just doesn't seem right. And Lee Horsley's action movie star, played broadly for comedic effect, decreases the menace in a film that should reflect at least a modest tone of danger. Finally, it's also jarring to see Poirot looking at a model's posterior and remarking: "Not bad." Yes, Hercule admired ladies, but always in a respectful fashion. Weaknesses aside, Thirteen At Dinner benefits from location filming in England, a clever mystery, and the presence of Ustinov and Suchet. The latter, without his mustache and sporting an English accent, may be unrecognizable to fans of his Poirot series. He and Ustinov work well together and it's also fun to see a young Bill Nighy as one of the suspects. Still, Ustinov's next Poirot appearance, 1986's Dead Man's Folly, is a significant improvement and makes Poirot less of a bumbler. If you want to see a better version of Lord Edgware Dies, then I recommend you seek out the 2000 adaptation with Suchet. It make take some liberties with the novel, too, but it's the better of the two films.

Grade: C+.

This post is part of The Movie of the Week Blogathon hosted by the Classic Film & TV Cafe. Click here to visit the schedule and read about all the great made-for-TV movies in this blogathon.

7 comments:

  1. I enjoyed the novel (love the title!), but haven't seen this version yet. Expect it will be a hoot to see Suchet as "the chief inspector Japp".

    ReplyDelete
  2. Concise and informative review. I liked how you had it broken down like an executive summary. I admit the world of Agatha Christie is one I have yet to explore. There's just so much! Books, film, TV. You did me a service in narrowing the field and it appears EVIL UNDER THE SUN will be a good place in which to dip a toe. Yeah, I also despise bringing characters of past eras into modern times and having them act and speak uncharacteristically. It's happened to COLUMBO and PERRY MASON among others with wince-worthy results. I appreciate your comprehensive knowledge of Christie. You are definitely the go-to guy on all things Agatha.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Gary, I am far from a Christie authority, though I have seen all the Suchet TV episodes and the Ustinov movies. The latter is a good Poirot and I love EVIL UNDER THE SUN (which has a great cast, setting, and locale). But Suchet is the definitive Poirot, despite some of the TV episodes being uneven.

      Delete
  3. I haven't seen this version either, but enjoyed our review especially because I am a huge Christie fan. LORD EDGWARE DIES suffers, to my mind, from a rather obvious giveaway which cannot be helped and you'll know what I mean if you've read the story or seen the films based on the books.

    I was surprised that Christie, who was the master of the sleight of hand, parading this so front and center in a way which calls attention to itself. Not something she usually did.

    I love David Suchet's Poirot and Ustinov's turn as Poirot in EVIL UNDER THE SUN but I cannot ever love American actors in up-dated Christie plots. Christie's books were of their time. They do lend themselves well to so-called 'up-dating,' at least in my humble opinion.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think the Suchet version masks the murderer's modus operandi better than the Ustinov telefilm. I think Dame Agatha may have been trying to show that simplicity is sometimes the most effective method (of murder).

      Delete
  4. Of course, it should be: '...but enjoyed YOUR review...' Sorry.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Haha! I had to laugh at the thought of someone saying "Dude" in an Agatha Christie story. However, it still sounds worthwhile, because what's not to love about Peter Ustinov? Thanks for the introduction! :)

    ReplyDelete